Esbin Revolorio v. Loretta E. Lynch

Good Law
604 F. App'x 568
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 19, 201513-70823California272 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

• Esbin Orlando Revolorio, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen deportation proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed • by 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, and review de novo constitutional claims and questions of law. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir.2005). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Revolorio’s motion to reopen where notice was proper, see 8 U.S.C. § 1229 (a), and where Revolorio failed to appear at his hearing and did not establish exceptional circumstances to excuse his failure to appear, see 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(b)(5)(C)(i), (e)(1); cf. Romani v. INS, 146 F.3d 737 , 739 (9th Cir.1998) (no failure to appear when petitioners were at courtroom on time but were incorrectly told by counsel’s assistant that the immigration judge had already ordered them deported in absentia). It follows that Re-volorio’s due process claim fails. See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir.2000) (requiring error and prejudice to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.