Rossiter

Rossiter v. Lightbourne CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 20, 2015C071629California3,934 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/20/15 Rossiter v. Lightbourne CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento)

ALEXIS ROSSITER, C071629

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 34-2010- 80000527-CU-WM-GDS) v.

WILL LIGHTBOURNE, as Director, etc., et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

By statute, benefit recipients in the CalWORKS1 program, California’s welfare-to- work program, are entitled to “supportive services” that are necessary to participate in the particular job training or educational program to which they are assigned. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 11323.2.) 2 Supportive services include child care, transportation costs, and

1 California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids Program (CalWORKS), Welfare and Institutions…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.