People v. Granados CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 20, 2015C077265California282 words

Opinion

Opinion

BACKGROUND

In 2011, defendant was convicted of violating Penal Code section 289, subdivision (i). As a result, defendant is required to register as a sex offender. In April 2014, law enforcement attempted to contact defendant for a compliance check. When they arrived

1 at the address where he was registered, they learned defendant did not live there and had not lived there for over a month. Defendant was arrested and charged with failure to register his change of address. (Pen. Code, § 290.013.) Defendant pleaded guilty to the charge. Defendant also admitted this conduct violated his postrelease community supervision in case No. CRMS- 14-0018. The trial court subsequently denied defendant's request for probation and sentenced him to an aggregate term of two years in state prison, along with a concurrent term of 180 days in case No. CRMS-14-0018. The court ordered defendant to pay various fines and fees and awarded him 137 days of custody credit. Defendant appeals without a certificate of probable cause.

DISCUSSION

Counsel filed an opening brief setting forth the facts of the case and requests that we review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.