Huntsman

Huntsman v. Krupnick CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 20, 2015B253877California1,460 words

Opinion

Opinion

Yegan, J.

Filed 5/20/15 Huntsman v. Krupnick CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

ROY HUNTSMAN, 2d Civil No. B253877 (Super. Ct. No. SC044885) Plaintiff and Appellant, (Ventura County)

v.

NEIL L. KRUPNICK et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

Roy Huntsman, an attorney, appeals from the judgment entered in favor of respondents Neil L. Krupnick, also an attorney, and his professional law corporation, Neil Lawrence Krupnick, Inc., dba Krupnick & Associates. After a jury returned a special verdict in respondents' favor on appellant's legal causes of action, appellant demanded that the court try his equitable cause of action for an accounting. The court refused.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.