Esteban Chavez Amador v. Loretta E. Lynch

Good Law
604 F. App'x 600
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 20, 201512-72502, 12-73825California319 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

In these consolidated petitions for review, Esteban Chavez Amador, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) orders dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“U”) removal order, and denying his motion to reopen. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review de novo due process claims. Cruz Rendon v. Holder, 603 F.3d 1104, 1109 (9th Cir.2010). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

Chavez Amador’s claim that the IJ’s denial of a fourth motion for a continuance to appeal the state court’s denial of post-conviction relief violated his due process rights lacks merit, where he was afforded a full and fair hearing and he failed to demonstrate prejudice. See Cruz Rendon, 603 F.3d at 1109 (“In order to prevail on [a due process] claim, the alien ... must show prejudice, ‘which means that the outcome of the proceeding may have been affected by the alleged violation.’ ” (citation omitted)).

Chavez Amador has not raised, and has therefore waived, any challenge to the BIA’s denial of his motion to reopen based on ineffective assistance. See Rizk v. Holder, 629 F.3d 1083 , 1091 n.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.