Higgs

Higgs v. United Prof. Real Estate Inspectors CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 21, 2015C074571California4,388 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/21/15 Higgs v. United Prof. Real Estate Inspectors CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Placer) ----

ROY HIGGS, C074571

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. SCV0028391)

v.

UNITED PROFESSIONAL REAL ESTATE

INSPECTORS, INC., et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

Defendants United Professional Real Estate Inspectors, Inc., Mold Detectives, Inc., and Husbands for Rent, Inc., (collectively, UPRI) appeal from a default judgment entered by the trial court (Curry, J.) in favor of plaintiff Roy A. Higgs. The trial court (Jones, J.) imposed terminating sanctions after accepting the recommendations of the discovery referee (Sims, J, Ret.) who had found UPRI intentionally destroyed or withheld…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.