People v. Bell CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 22, 2015D066925California189 words

Opinion

Huffman, J.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

The parties stipulated that the transcript of the preliminary hearing established the

factual basis for the plea. The transcript reflects that on September 16, 2004, Bell was

driving a vehicle. At that time he fired a gunshot at the victim's car. The shot hit and

killed the victim.

DISCUSSION

As we have indicated, counsel has asked this court to review the record for error

pursuant to Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436. Pursuant to Anders v. California (1967) 386

U.S. 738 (Anders), counsel has identified the following possible, but not arguable issues

to assist this court's review of the record:

1. Whether the court abused its discretion in denying Bell's request for a lesser

restitution fine than the $10,000 fine imposed by the court?

2 2. Whether the court properly awarded custody credits pursuant to In re Rojas

(1979) 23 Cal.3d 152?

3. Whether the court properly applied enhancements under section 667.5,

subdivisions (a) and (b))?

We have reviewed the entire record and have not identified any reasonably

arguable issues for reversal on appeal. Competent counsel has represented Bell on this

appeal.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

HUFFMAN, J.

WE CONCUR:

McCONNELL, P. J.

McDONALD, J.

3