People v. Pacheco CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 26, 2015C076989California663 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/26/15 P. v. Pacheco CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sutter) ----

THE PEOPLE, C076989

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. CRF122028)

v.

FRANCISCO Y. PACHECO,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Francisco Y. Pacheco was charged with cultivating marijuana and being armed with a firearm in the commission of the offense. Defendant initially pled no contest to cultivating marijuana. The trial court conditionally accepted the plea on the promise that defendant would be placed on probation, including 60 days served in county jail. The People moved to dismiss the arming allegation as part of the plea agreement. The trial court took the matter under submission to be ruled on at the time of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.