Wong

Wong v. Stoler CA1/1

Bad Law
188 Cal. Rptr. 3d 674·2015 Cal. App. LEXIS 545·237 Cal. App. 4th 1375
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 26, 2015A138270California5,296 words

Opinion

Opinion

Humes, J.

I.

INTRODUCTION

Wayson and Susanna Wong bought a hillside home in San Carlos (City) for $2.35 million from Ira and Toby Stoler. Several months after they moved in, the Wongs discovered that they and 12 of their neighbors were connected to a private sewer system and were not directly serviced by the City’s public system. Believing they had been deceived, they sued the Stolers and the real estate agents who brokered the sale alleging various causes of action, including rescission. After the Wongs settled their dispute with the real estate agents for $200,000, a court trial was held on the rescission claim only. Although the court found that the Stolers, with reckless disregard, made negligent misrepresentations to the Wongs, it declined to effectuate a rescission of the contract. Instead, it ordered the Stolers to be, for a limited time, indemnifiers to the Wongs for sewer maintenance and repair costs exceeding the $200,000 they obtained in their settlement with the agents.

On appeal, the Wongs contend that the trial court erred in denying rescission, ordering the alternative relief, and denying them attorney fees. The Stolers contend in a cross-appeal that the trial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.