Hetman

Hetman v. Cal. Capital Ins. CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 28, 2015G048894California4,968 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/28/15 Hetman v. Cal. Capital Ins. CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

WAYNE T. HETMAN,

G048894

Cross-Complainant and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 30-2009-00325635) v.

OPINION

CALIFORNIA CAPITAL INSURANCE

COMPANY,

Cross-Defendant and Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, Sheila Fell, Judge. Reversed. Wayne T. Hetman, in pro. per., for Cross-Complainant and Appellant. Wade & Lowe and Victor R. Anderson; Haight Brown & Bonesteel, Victor R. Anderson and Vangi M. Johnson for Cross-Defendant and Respondent. * * * Wayne T. Hetman appeals from the trial court’s entry of judgment in favor of California Capital Insurance Company (CCIC) after the trial court granted CCIC’s summary judgment motion on Hetman’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.