Verdugo

Verdugo v. Alliantgroup, L.P.

Bad Law
187 Cal. Rptr. 3d 613·2015 Cal. App. LEXIS 466·237 Cal. App. 4th 141·2015 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 167
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 28, 2015G049139California8,247 words

Opinion

Opinion

Aronson, J.

Plaintiff and appellant Rachel Verdugo appeals from an order granting a motion to stay this wage and hour lawsuit based on a forum selection clause in her employment agreement with defendant and respondent Alliantgroup, L.P. (Alliantgroup). The clause designates Harris County, Texas, as the exclusive forum for any dispute arising out of Verdugo’s employment, and also includes a provision designating Texas law as governing all disputes. Verdugo contends the trial court erred because enforcing the forum selection clause and related choice-of-law clause violates California’s public policy on employee compensation. We agree and reverse the trial court’s order.

Although a party opposing enforcement of a forum selection clause ordinarily bears the burden to show enforcement would be unreasonable or unfair, the burden is reversed when the underlying claims are based on statutory rights the Legislature has declared to be unwaivable. In that instance,' the party seeking to enforce the forum selection clause has the burden to show enforcement would not diminish unwaivable California statutory rights, otherwise a forum selection clause could be used to force a plaintiff to litigate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.