Jones

Jones v. Credit Auto Center, Inc.

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 28, 2015JAD15-05California4,329 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ricciardulli, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

Appellant and plaintiff Anwar Jones appeals the judgment in favor of respondent and defendant Credit Auto Center, Inc. and its surety, International Fidelity Insurance Company, following a court trial. (Further references to defendant are to Credit Auto Center, Inc.) Plaintiff contends the court erred in entering judgment against him on his causes of action based on defendant‟s violation of the implied warranty of merchantability under the Song Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (Song-Beverly Act) (Civ. Code, § 1790 et seq.), and defendant‟s deceptive sales practices under the Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA) (Civ. Code, § 1750 et seq.). As discussed below, we reverse the judgment.

There was insufficient evidence to support the judgment in favor of defendant. Plaintiff proved a Song-Beverly Act cause of action because the vehicle he purchased from defendant was unfit for use as transportation due to a crack or hole in the transmission oil pan and a faulty transmission, which rendered the vehicle inoperable approximately one month after the purchase. Plaintiff proved his CLRA cause of action because defendant‟s oral and written representations stating the vehicle…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.