John Bray v. Jeff Premo

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 1, 201514-35011California1,338 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 01 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

JOHN MICHAEL BRAY, No. 14-35011

Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. 6:03-cv-01762-TC District of Oregon, v. Eugene

JEFF PREMO, Superintendent,

ORDER

Respondent - Appellee.

Before: PAEZ and IKUTA, Circuit Judges and SELNA,* District Judge.

Page 5 of the Memorandum, filed on March 30, 2015, is amended as

follows: Change to

postconviction petition> and delete the sentence

raised this claim for the first time in his postconviction appeal to the state court of

appeals.>. An amended Memorandum is filed concurrently with this order.

The panel has voted to deny Bray’s petition for panel rehearing.

Accordingly, the petition for panel rehearing is DENIED. No further petitions for

rehearing may be filed.

* The Honorable James V. Selna, District Judge for the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, sitting by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.