Swan

Swan v. Tesconi CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 2, 2015A138119California5,194 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 6/2/15 Swan v. Tesconi CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

PENNY SWAN,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A138119

v. DOROTHY TESCONI, as Trustee, etc., (Sonoma County et al., Super. Ct. No. SCV247226) Defendants and Appellants.

Defendants/appellants Dorothy Tesconi, individually and as trustee of the Charles D. and Dorothy E. Tesconi Trust (Tesconi), and Chad Young (Young) (together, defendants), appeal from the trial court’s post-judgment order awarding attorney fees and costs to plaintiff/respondent Penny Swan (Swan). In issuing the order, the trial court rejected defendants’ claim that Swan was precluded from recovering fees and costs and was required to pay defendants’ fees and costs…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.