Garrido

Garrido v. Air Liquide Industrial US CA2/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 3, 2015B254490California4,616 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 6/3/15 Garrido v. Air Liquide Industrial US CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

MARIO GARRIDO, B254490

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC485942) v.

AIR LIQUIDE INDUSTRIAL U.S. LP,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Amy D. Hogue, Judge. Reversed.

Littler Mendelson, Nancy E. Pritikin, Dominic J. Messiha, Jennifer Tsao for Defendant and Appellant.

Esensten Law, Robert Esensten, Jordan S. Esensten for Plaintiff and Respondent.

___________________________________________________ The trial court denied a motion to compel arbitration, finding that arbitration was improper under Gentry v. Superior Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.