Mukesh Patel v. Loretta E. Lynch

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 3, 201511-73804California914 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUN 03 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MUKESH BABUBHAI PATEL, No. 11-73804

Petitioner, Agency No. A096-385-939

v.

MEMORANDUM*

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 3, 2015** San Francisco, California

Before: PAEZ and BERZON, Circuit Judges and EZRA,*** District Judge.

Mukesh Patel, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the

decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying his application for

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable David A. Ezra, District Judge for the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, sitting by designation. withholding of removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture

(“CAT”), and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.