Chung

People v. Chung

Good Law
187 Cal. Rptr. 3d 873·2015 Cal. App. LEXIS 486·237 Cal. App. 4th 462
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 4, 2015B253580California4,111 words

Opinion

Opinion

Collins, J.

INTRODUCTION

Defendant Helen Chung appeals from her conviction by jury on three counts of offering narcotics for sale, with special allegations regarding prior narcotics convictions. She was sentenced to a total term of 16 years four months and was ordered to pay various fines and fees. Chung raises a number of contentions on appeal: first, that the prosecutor improperly struck the only African-American prospective juror from the panel during voir dire; second, that evidence of her prior convictions was improperly admitted at trial; third, that one of the police officer witnesses gave improper and unqualified expert testimony; and fourth, that the consecutive sentences she received violated the bar on multiple punishment for a single act under Penal Code section 654. We reverse the judgment with respect to the consecutive sentences imposed on counts five (offer to sell methamphetamine) and six (offer to sell cocaine) and remand to the trial court for proceedings consistent with this opinion. We affirm the judgment in all other respects.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

A. Procedural Background

An information charged Chung (also known as Thuy Pham) with the following six…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.