People v. Lavoie CA

FACTS

Lavoie admitted that, on March 29, 2014, he unlawfully possessed

methamphetamine in a usable amount.

DISCUSSION

Appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief summarizing the facts and

proceedings below. Counsel presents no argument for reversal, but asks this court to

review the record for error as mandated by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 and

Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738. Counsel identifies as a possible issue whether

the motion to suppress should have been granted, but presents no argument for reversal as

to this claim.

We granted Lavoie permission to file a supplemental brief on his own behalf, but

he has not responded. A review of the record pursuant to People v. Wende, supra, 25

Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California, supra, 386 U.S. 738 has disclosed no reasonably

arguable appellate issues. Lavoie has been competently represented by counsel on this

appeal.

2

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

McDONALD, Acting P. J.

WE CONCUR:

McINTYRE, J.

O'ROURKE, J.

3