People v. Luster CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 8, 2015B248247California3,062 words

Opinion

Opinion

Yegan, J.

Filed 6/8/15 P. v. Luster CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

THE PEOPLE, 2d Crim. No. B248247 (Super. Ct. No. CR49259) Plaintiff and Respondent, (Ventura County)

v.

ANDREW STUART LUSTER,

Defendant and Appellant.

A jury convicted Andrew Stuart Luster of multiple sex offenses committed against three women whom he had drugged. Appellant videotaped his sex acts with two of the women. During the trial, appellant fled the jurisdiction. In February 2003 he was sentenced in absentia to prison for 124 years. In June 2003 we dismissed his appeal without opinion because he was a fugitive from justice. In an unpublished opinion filed after appellant had been captured in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.