John Doe I v. Nestle, USA
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 10, 201510-56739California6,434 words
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOHN DOE I; JOHN DOE II; No. 10-56739 JOHN DOE III, individually and on behalf of proposed D.C. No. class members; GLOBAL 2:05-CV-05133-SVW-
EXCHANGE, JTL
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v. ORDER AND
AMENDED ORDER
NESTLE USA, INC.; ARCHER
DANIELS MIDLAND
COMPANY; CARGILL
INCORPORATED COMPANY;
CARGILL COCOA,
Defendants-Appellees.
Filed May 6, 2015 Amended June 10, 2015
Before: Dorothy W. Nelson, Kim McLane Wardlaw, and Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Circuit Judges.
Order; Amended Order; Dissent by Judge Bea SUMMARY*
Alien Tort Statute
The panel denied a petition for panel rehearing and, on behalf of the court, a petition for rehearing en banc.
Dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc, Judge Bea, joined by Judges O’Scannlain, Gould, Tallman, Bybee, Callahan, M. Smith, and N.R. Smith, wrote that the panel majority had substituted sympathy for legal analysis in concluding that the defendant corporations engaged in the Ivory Coast cocoa trade with the purpose that the plaintiffs be…