People v. Walker CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 10, 2015E062842California102 words

Opinion

DISCUSSION

We offered defendant an opportunity to file a personal supplemental brief, but he

has not done so. Pursuant to the mandate of People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, we

have independently reviewed the record for potential error and find no arguable issues.

(§§ 667, subd. (e)(2)(C)(iv)(I) & Welf. & Inst. Code, § 6600, subd. (b) [Defendant not

entitled to resentencing pursuant to section 1170.18 where he has suffered a prior felony

conviction for a sexually violent offense.].)

3

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

CODRINGTON

J.

We concur:

RAMIREZ

P. J.

HOLLENHORST

J.

4