People v. Walker CA4/2
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 10, 2015E062842California102 words
Opinion
DISCUSSION
We offered defendant an opportunity to file a personal supplemental brief, but he
has not done so. Pursuant to the mandate of People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, we
have independently reviewed the record for potential error and find no arguable issues.
(§§ 667, subd. (e)(2)(C)(iv)(I) & Welf. & Inst. Code, § 6600, subd. (b) [Defendant not
entitled to resentencing pursuant to section 1170.18 where he has suffered a prior felony
conviction for a sexually violent offense.].)
3
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
CODRINGTON
J.
We concur:
RAMIREZ
P. J.
HOLLENHORST
J.
4