People v. Hardy CA4/1

DISCUSSION

Appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief summarizing the facts and

proceedings in the trial court. Counsel presented no argument for reversal, instead

inviting this court to review the record for error in accordance with Wende, supra, 25

Cal.3d 436.

Pursuant to Anders, supra, 386 U.S. 738, counsel identified as possible but not

arguable issues (1) whether the 136 days of custody ordered by the court are statutorily

authorized; (2) whether substantial admissible evidence supports the findings that Hardy

left the residential treatment facility in violation of its rules, and that Hardy was not

taking the previously prescribed and ordered medications; and (3) whether the court

properly calculated Hardy's credits.

After we received counsel's brief, we gave Hardy an opportunity to file a

supplemental brief, but she did not respond.

We have reviewed the record pursuant to Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436, and

Anders, supra, 386 U.S. 738, and have considered the issues suggested by counsel, but

3 have discerned no reasonably arguable appellate issue. Hardy has been adequately

represented by counsel on this appeal.

DISPOSITION

The order is affirmed.

IRION, J.

WE CONCUR:

BENKE, Acting P. J.

HUFFMAN, J.

4