Aramid Entertainment Fund Ltd. v. Tutor (In Re R2D2, LLC)

Good Law
607 F. App'x 724
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 10, 201513-55029California344 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

This case was decided by the bankruptcy court on June 18, 2012, and affirmed by the district court on December 21, 2012. On May 27, 2015, the bankruptcy court dismissed the underlying bankruptcy cases and on May 28, 2015, the bankruptcy court denied the Trustee’s emergency motions for stay pending appeal of the bankruptcy cases dismissal orders. Because this appeal has now become moot as a result of the dismissal of the underlying bankruptcy actions, we dismiss.

“A case is moot if the issues presented are no longer live and there fails to be a ‘case or controversy’ under Article III of the Constitution. The test for mootness of an appeal is whether the appellate court can give the appellant any effective relief in the event that it decides the matter on the merits in his favor.” In re Burrell, 415 F.3d 994 , 998 (9th Cir.2005) (internal citations and quotation marks omitted).

The issue on appeal in this case is whether the district court erred in affirming the bankruptcy court’s order disallowing RICO, fraudulent inducement, and alter-ego liability claims brought by Aramid Entertainment Fund Limited and Aramid Entertainment B.V. (Aramid) in the underlying bankruptcy…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.