People v. Jeffries CA4/1
Opinion
Opinion
Huffman, J.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
We first observe that Jeffries does not challenge either the admissibility or the
sufficiency of the evidence to support his convictions. Thus we will provide a limited
statement of facts to give context to the discussion which follows.
The victim in this case, Michael Welch, operates a plumbing business. In October
2012, Welch met Jeffries at a function in Pismo Beach. At some point they discussed
Jeffries working for Welch on a part-time basis.
About a month later, Jeffries contacted Welch and they agreed Jeffries would do
some work for Welch. He would be paid $100 per day and would receive his train fare.
Jeffries did work for Welch for three days and was paid $300 plus train fare.
Jeffries returned to San Diego again in December 2012 on a Sunday evening. He
stayed at Welch's home that night. Jeffries worked Monday and returned to Welch's
home. Welch went out and returned with another person at about 7:30 or 8:00 p.m. that
night. When he returned he found beer cans about the house and Jeffries in an
intoxicated condition.
Welch ordered Jeffries to pack up and leave, at which point Jeffries became
enraged. Once they got into…