United States v. Jacorey Taylor

Good Law
617 F. App'x 671
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 11, 201513-10572California1,225 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Jacorey Taylor appeals his convictions for 1) conspiracy to engage in a racketeering influenced corruption organization, 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (d); 2) violent crime in aid of racketeering, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1959 (a)(1) & (2); 3) use of a firearm during a crime of violence, 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c)(1); 4) conspiracy to engage in drug trafficking, 21 U.S.C. § 846 ; and 5) two counts of possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance, 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1) & (b)(l)(C)(iii). We AFFIRM.

1. Motion for Judgment of Acquittal

Where, as here, the defendant did not renew his Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 29 motion for judgment of acquittal following the close of his own case, we review the denial of that motion for plain error. United States v. Cruz, 554 F.3d 840, 844 (9th Cir.2009); United States v. Patton, 771 F.2d 1240, 1243 (9th Cir.1985). Taylor’s main argument is that defense witnesses testified to his innocence. On a Rule 29 motion, however, the court must construe the evidence in the light most favorable to the government. United States v. Odom, 329 F.3d 1032, 1034 (9th Cir.2003).

Resolving all credibility issues in the government’s favor, it is clear that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.