Joseph J. Tynan v. Frank A. Eyman, Warden, Arizona State Prison

Good Law
397 F.2d 53
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 18, 196822453California1,077 words

Opinion

Opinion

Jertberg, J.

Appellant is in state custody serving a prison sentence imposed on April 30, 1956, by the Superior Court of the State of Arizona in and for the County of Maricopa, following conviction by a jury of the charges of rape and assault. No appeal from the judgment of conviction was taken.

The first appearance in this court of this cause was an appeal from an order of the district court denying, without a hearing, appellant’s application for a writ of habeas corpus filed in the district court on April 15, 1965. In that application, appellant alleged (1) that he was denied his constitutional right to be represented by court appointed counsel at his preliminary examination; and (2) that perjured testimony procured by the prosecutor was used against him in his jury trial held in the Superior Court —the trial resulting in his conviction.

On the first appeal we vacated the order of the district court denying appellant’s application for a writ of habeas corpus, and remanded the cause to the district court for the issuance of an order to show cause on appellee, and for an evidentiary hearing at which time appellant should be present. See Tynan v. Eyman, 371 F.2d 764 (9th Cir. 1967). In that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.