Cross Petroleum v. Bal CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 11, 2015C075956California2,897 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 6/11/15 Cross Petroleum v. Bal CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Shasta) ----

CROSS PETROLEUM, C075956

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 167467)

v.

RAJINDER SINGH BAL,

Defendant and Respondent.

Plaintiff Cross Petroleum appeals from the judgment of the trial court in favor of defendant Rajinder Singh Bal. In its statement of decision, the court found Bal was neither engaged in a joint venture with codefendants (none of whom are parties to this appeal) who had defaulted on a fuel sales agreement with Cross Petroleum for a gas

1 station that they had operated, nor was Bal liable as a guarantor on the basis of a credit agreement with Cross Petroleum for the benefit of the gas station that Bal had…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.