City of Indian Wells v. Lawellin CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
INTRODUCTION
This matter concerns a tall ficus tree hedge located on defendants Douglas
Lawellin and Steven Rohlin’s (defendants) residential property. The hedge violates the 1 City of Indian Wells’ (City) zoning ordinance limiting the height of hedges to a
maximum of nine feet (Ordinance 652). After a neighbor complained the hedge was
blocking her view of the desert mountains, the City filed an application to abate the hedge
as a public nuisance. Defendants appeal from judgment entered following the trial court
granting the City’s application for an abatement warrant and motion for attorney fees and
costs.
Defendants contend the City failed to prove the hedge constituted a public
nuisance and the City does not have authority to abate the hedge as a private nuisance.
Defendants further assert that Ordinance 652’s expansive definition of a public nuisance
is preempted by state statutory nuisance law. Defendants also argue that, even if the
hedge qualifies as a nuisance under Ordinance 652, the hedge is a permissible
nonconforming land use exempt from abatement. In addition, defendants contend the
trial court abused its discretion in granting the City’s motion for…