People v. Kelly CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 12, 2015F067082California1,650 words

Opinion

Opinion

DISCUSSION

“On November 6, 2012, the voters approved Proposition 36, the Three Strikes Reform Act of 2012, which amended sections 667 and 1170.12 and added section 1170.126 (hereafter the Act). The Act changes the requirements for sentencing a third strike offender to an indeterminate term of 25 years to life imprisonment. Under the original version of the three strikes law a recidivist with two or more prior strikes who is convicted of any new felony is subject to an indeterminate life sentence. The Act diluted the three strikes law by reserving the life sentence for cases where the current crime is a serious or violent felony or the prosecution has pled and proved an enumerated disqualifying factor. In all other cases, the recidivist will be sentenced as a second strike offender.” (People v. Yearwood (2013) 213 Cal.App.4th 161, 167-168.) In addition to reforming three strikes sentencing for defendants convicted after the effective date of the Act, the Act also added section 1170.126 to provide for retroactive reform of existing three strikes sentences imposed before the effective date of the Act. Section 1170.126 “provides a means whereby, under three specified eligibility…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.