Ashton Jones v. Board of Regents of the University and State Colleges of Arizona, Douglas Paxton

Good Law
397 F.2d 259·1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 6551
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 13, 196821755California362 words

Opinion

Opinion

Before us is an interlocutory appeal from the order of the district court denying appellant’s prayer, contained in his amended complaint, for an injunction pendente lite to restrain the members of the Board of Regents of the University and State Colleges of Arizona, and one Douglas Paxton, from preventing or interfering with appellant’s exercising of his freedom of speech and other constitutional guarantees while on the University of Arizona campus, and that they be commanded to protect the person of the appellant while on the University of Arizona campus in a manner reasonably necessary to allow the exercise of his freedom of speech and other constitutional guarantees.

In the amended complaint, appellant also seeks a permanent injunction and damages in the amount of $10,020.00. The amended complaint predicates jurisdiction of the district court under 28 U.S.C. § 1343 .

Basically, the amended complaint alleges that appellant’s rights, conferred by the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution, and by the provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , were violated.

It is to be borne in mind that the appeal before us is not one from a final judgment after trial, or from a summary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.