People v. Yates CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 15, 2015C073748California2,566 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 6/15/15 P. v. Yates CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Butte) ----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, C073748

v. (Super. Ct. Nos. CM035053,

CM037258)

RODNEY JOSEPH YATES,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Rodney Joseph Yates challenges an award of presentence custody credits he received pursuant to Penal Code section 4019.1 He claims he should have received an additional day of conduct credit because one of the crimes for which he was sentenced was committed after October 1, 2011. However, he concedes he could not accrue such credit following his initial sentencing. Alternatively, he contends section 4019 violates equal protection by treating differently those who commit

…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.