P.U.C.

Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

Good Law
188 Cal. Rptr. 3d 374·2015 Cal. App. LEXIS 512·237 Cal. App. 4th 812
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 16, 2015A142127California4,088 words

Opinion

Opinion

Richman, J.

Pursuant to its statutory authority to adopt “rules of practice and procedure” (Pub. Util. Code, § 1701, subd. (a)), the Public Utilities Commission (PUC or Commission) promulgated rule 1.1, which provides in pertinent part: “Any person who . . . transacts business with the Commission . . . agrees . . . never to mislead the Commission or its staff by an artifice or false statement of fact or law.” (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 20, § 1.1 (Rule 1.1).)

In the aftermath of a massive 2010 explosion of an underground gas pipeline owned and operated by Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), the PUC imposed a series of reforms to be instituted by PG&E. One of those reforms was that PG&E improve its recordkeeping and information technology capabilities. PG&E was directed to keep the PUC informed of any reported pipeline leaks and any discovered information regarding the safety of continuing pipeline operations. Thereafter, following discovery of a pipeline leak, PG&E also discovered that some information it had provided to the PUC concerning the internal pressure at which certain pipelines could be safely operated might not be correct. Approximately seven months after discovery of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.