Rustam

Rustam v. Wells Fargo Bank CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 16, 2015B254445California1,920 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 6/16/15 Rustam v. Wells Fargo Bank CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

MOHAMMED RUSTAM, Individually B254445 and as Trustee, etc., et al., (Los Angeles County Plaintiffs and Appellants, Super. Ct. No. BC478839)

v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEALS from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Malcolm H. Mackey, Judge. As to Mohammed Rustam, the judgment is affirmed. As to Mustafa Rustam, the appeal is dismissed. Obagi & Stodder and Zein E. Obagi, Jr., for Plaintiffs and Appellants, Mohammed Rustam and Mustafa Rustam. Barton, Klugman & Oetting and Tod V. Beebe for Defendant and Respondent, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ______________ Mohammed Rustam appeals the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.