People v. Chandra CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 16, 2015A138401California12,250 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 6/16/15 P. v. Chandra CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A138401

v. AARON CHANDRA, (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. CH50444) Defendant and Appellant.

In re AARON CHANDRA

A143741

on Habeas Corpus.

Defendant Aaron Chandra appeals from a judgment convicting him of second degree murder and possession of marijuana for sale and sentencing him to a term of 40 years to life in prison. On appeal, he argues that an instructional error and two evidentiary errors require reversal of his convictions. He also argues in his direct appeal, and in a petition for habeas corpus, that his trial attorney provided ineffective assistance and that the prosecutor engaged in pervasive and prejudicial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.