In re Cellphone Termination Fee Cases CA1/5

Filed 6/16/15 In re Cellphone Termination Fee Cases CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

IN RE CELLPHONE TERMINATION A140302

FEE CASES.

(Alameda County _____________________________________/ Super. Ct. No. RG03121510)

This consumer class action challenges wireless telephone carrier Sprint Spectrum, L.P.’s (Sprint) policy of charging early termination fees (ETF’s) to consumers terminating service before defined contract periods expire.1 The latest chapter in this ongoing litigation concerns the retrial of Sprint’s damages pursuant to our 2011 opinion in Cellphone Termination Fee Cases, supra, 193 Cal.App.4th 298. On retrial, Sprint presented two alternate theories of damages: (1) lost profits…