City of Roseville v. Zisk CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 16, 2015C073496California4,137 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 6/16/15 City of Roseville v. Zisk CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Placer)

CITY OF ROSEVILLE, C073496

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No.

S-CV-0032376)

v.

JOHN WILLIAM ZISK,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant John William Zisk appeals from an order granting a workplace violence restraining order to the City of Roseville (City) on behalf of its city manager, Ray Kerridge. (Code Civ. Proc., § 527.8.)1 Zisk contends that there is insufficient evidence that he made a credible threat of violence, and the injunction impermissibly burdens his rights to petition government for redress of grievances and travel under the federal and state Constitutions. We shall affirm the order.

…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.