Casey

Casey v. Dynalectric CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 17, 2015A139311California2,961 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 6/17/15 Casey v. Dynalectric CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

PATRICIA CASEY et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,

A139311

v. DYNALECTRIC COMPANY, (City & County of San Francisco Super. Ct. No. CGC-11-275879) Defendant and Respondent.

Patricia Casey, Catherine Grabinksi and Jessica Casey (plaintiffs) appeal from the entry of summary judgment in favor of the defendant Dynalectric Company on plaintiffs’ negligence claims. Plaintiffs alleged, among other things, that John Casey (hereafter Casey or decedent) was injured and later died as a result of his injuries, after negligent conduct by defendant’s employees caused Casey to be exposed to asbestos-containing dust. The trial court found that defendant did not owe Casey a duty…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.