Paulek
Paulek v. Western Riverside Co. Regional Conservation Auth.
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 6/17/
CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
ALBERT THOMAS PAULEK,
Plaintiff and Appellant, E059133
v. (Super.Ct.No. RIC1203353)
WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY OPINION
REGIONAL CONSERVATION
AUTHORITY,
Defendant and Respondent;
ANHEUSER-BUSCH, LLC,
Real Party in Interest and Respondent.
APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Daniel A. Ottolia,
Judge. Reversed.
Susan Nash for Plaintiff and Appellant.
1 Best Best & Krieger, Michelle Ouellette, Charity Schiller and Lucas I. Quass for
Defendant and Respondent Western Riverside County Regional Conservation
Authority.
Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis, K. Erik Friess and Nicholas S.
Shantar for Real Party in Interest and Respondent Anheuser-Busch, LLC.
Plaintiff and appellant Albert Thomas Paulek petitioned the trial court for a writ
of mandate. In the petition, Paulek alleged defendant and respondent Western Riverside
County Regional Conservation Authority (the Agency) erred by concluding (1) a
particular activity is not a…