People v. Martin CA4/1

DISCUSSION

There are no relevant facts to discuss in this appeal. Appellate counsel presents no

argument for reversal of the trial court's order, but asks this court to review the record for

error as mandated by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende) and Anders v.

California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 (Anders), raising these possible but not arguable

appellate issues: (1) Did the trial court abuse its discretion in refusing to issue a

certificate of probable cause? (2) Did the trial court abuse its discretion in denying

Martin's Marsden motions? (3) Is Martin's guilty plea constitutionally valid? (4) Was

there a sufficient factual basis for the plea? and (5) Was Martin's admission of the prior

prison term enhancement knowingly and intelligently made?

We offered Martin the opportunity to file his own brief on appeal but he has not

done so.

We have reviewed the entire record in accordance with Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d

436 and Anders, supra, 386 U.S. 738, and have not found any arguable appellate issue.

Competent counsel has represented Martin on this appeal.

2

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

O'ROURKE, J.

WE CONCUR:

HUFFMAN, Acting P. J.

IRION, J.

3