People v. Hoang CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 19, 2015C077393California941 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 6/19/15 P. v. Hoang CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Yolo) ----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, C077393

v. (Super. Ct. No. CRF134187)

THANH KIM HOANG,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appointed counsel for defendant Thanh Kim Hoang asked this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende).) Based on our examination of the entire record, we will modify the judgment to dismiss two counts as provided in the plea agreement, and to award 16 days of presentence credit. We will affirm the judgment as modified. We will also direct the trial court to correct the minute order and abstract of judgment to reflect the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.