22:I[98912,["/_next/static/chunks/0asocxi83kb~5.js","/_next/static/chunks/0n4z.7yu76je-.js","/_next/static/chunks/0eyt_ou8dj52g.js","/_next/static/chunks/01bcia3bjqt9z.js","/_next/static/chunks/15egrlmmf_yst.js"],"CaseDetailGate"] 23:T4e2,MEMORANDUM Humberto Gostelos-Fuentes appeals from the district court’s judgments and challenges his guilty-plea convictions and concurrent 135-month sentences for unlawful reentry by a deported, removed, or excluded alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 , and conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1), (b)(l)(B)(viii) and 846. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Gostelo-Fuentes’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Gos-telo-Fuentes the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. Gostelo-Fuentes has waived his right to appeal his convictions and his 135-month sentences. Because the record discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the appeal waivers, we dismiss the appeals. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir.2009). Counsel’s motion to withdraw as counsel is GRANTED. DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.24:T514,

MEMORANDUM

Humberto Gostelos-Fuentes appeals from the district court’s judgments and challenges his guilty-plea convictions and concurrent 135-month sentences for unlawful reentry by a deported, removed, or excluded alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 , and conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1), (b)(l)(B)(viii) and 846. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Gostelo-Fuentes’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Gos-telo-Fuentes the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Gostelo-Fuentes has waived his right to appeal his convictions and his 135-month sentences. Because the record discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the appeal waivers, we dismiss the appeals. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir.2009).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw as counsel is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.