Edul Azeez, II v. Matthew Cate

Good Law
617 F. App'x 705
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 19, 201513-57027California343 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Edul “Sean” Azeez appeals the district court’s order denying his petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 . We review de novo, Harvest v. Castro, 531 F.3d 737, 741 (9th Cir.2008), and we affirm.

Azeez was the getaway driver for a 1995 vehicle burglary that resulted in the murder of the vehicle’s owner. Azeez, who is African-American, was sentenced to the upper term of 11 years’ imprisonment for voluntary manslaughter after he entered a guilty plea in exchange for the dismissal of murder charges. Two of his co-defendants, who are not African-American, received probation. Azeez asserts that the sentence disparity was based on racial discrimination and that his right to equal protection was violated. But one co-defendant was a minor; the other cooperated with the prosecution in identifying the men involved. The California Supreme Court summarily denied Azeez’s equal protection claim. In so doing, that court did not make “a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States” nor “a decision that was based on an unreasonable determination of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.