Vait

Vait v. Tanchuck CA2/4

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 22, 2015B254506California6,228 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 6/22/15 Vait v. Tanchuck CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

ANNETTE VAIT, B254506

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. SC115774) v.

MARSHAL TANCHUCK, as successor trustee, etc.,

Defendant and Respondent;

DONIGER / BURROUGHS et al.,

Interveners and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Gerald Rosenberg, Judge. Affirmed. Klapach & Klapach and Joseph S. Klapach for Plaintiff and Appellant. Doniger / Burroughs and Stephen M. Doniger for Interveners, Defendants, and Respondents. ____________________________ The trial court granted a motion for nonsuit at the close of plaintiff’s opening statement. We conclude…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.