Kohan

Kohan v. Pacifica L39 CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 24, 2015D066958California4,331 words

Opinion

Opinion

Nares, J.

Filed 6/24/15 Kohan v. Pacifica L39 CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

NEJAT KOHAN, D066958

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v. (Super. Ct. No. INC1104681)

PACIFICA L39, LLC,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Riverside, John G. Evans,

Judge. Affirmed.

Law Offices of Nejat Kohan, Nejat Kohan; and James S. Link for Plaintiff and

Appellant.

Hall & Bailey, John L. Bailey and Barbara M. Moore for Defendant and

Respondent.

This is one of many appeals arising from litigation over the renovation of a hotel

property in Palm Springs. This one arises from an attempt by the contractor, Nejat

Kohan, to foreclose on a mechanics lien and to recover in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.