Quiroz

Quiroz v. BNSF Railway CA2/4

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 24, 2015B250165California5,718 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 6/24/15 Quiroz v. BNSF Railway CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

TERESA QUIROZ et al., B250165

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC460217/JCCP v. 4674)

BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Emilie H. Elias, Judge. Affirmed. Waters Kraus & Paul, Paul C. Cook and Michael B. Gurien for Plaintiffs and Appellants. SIMS Law Firm and Selim Mounedji for Defendant and Respondent. Plaintiffs Teresa Quiroz, on her own behalf and as successor in interest to decedent Benjamin P. Thoms (Thoms), Tamara A. Rose, and Donald P. Thoms appeal from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.