Grewal

People Ex Rel. Green v. Grewal

Good Law
189 Cal. Rptr. 3d 686·2015 Cal. LEXIS 4519·61 Cal. 4th 544·352 P.3d 275
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJune 25, 2015S217896, S217979California8,609 words

Opinion

Opinion

Chin, J.

Slot machines, sometimes called “one-armed bandits” (although younger users might wonder why), have long been outlawed in California. Under review are devices that resemble traditional casino-style slot machines in some ways and offer users the chance to win sweepstakes prizes. Because they employ modem technology, the devices differ from traditional slot machines in some ways. We must decide whether the devices come within the statutory definition of a “slot machine or device” in Penal Code section 330b. We conclude they do and affirm the judgments of the Court of Appeal, which reached the same conclusion.

I. Facts and Procedural History

These facts are taken largely from the Court of Appeal opinions authored by Justice Kane.

In these cases, which we have consolidated for argument and this opinion, the People of the State of California, by and through the District Attorney of Kern County, filed civil actions against defendants Kirnpal Grewal, John C. Stidman, Phillip Ernest Walker, Kamal Kenny Nasser, and Ghassan Elmalih, operators of Internet cafés in Kern County. Three distinct, albeit similar, devices operated at several Internet café businesses are at issue here.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.