People v. Grim CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 25, 2015D067435California4,554 words

Opinion

Opinion

Aaron, J.

I.

INTRODUCTION

A jury found Joseph Sentelle Grim guilty of attempted robbery (Pen. Code,

§§ 664, 211),1 burglary (§ 459), and assault with a deadly weapon (§ 245, subd. (a)(1)).

The jury also found that Grim personally used a deadly weapon, a knife, during the

commission of the attempted robbery (§ 12022, subd. (b)(1)). After the jury rendered its

verdicts, Grim admitted having suffered a prior serious felony conviction (§ 667, subd.

(a)) and 10 prior strike convictions (§§ 667, subds. (c), (e)(2)(A), 1170.12, subd.

(c)(2)(A)). The trial court sentenced Grim to an aggregate term of 30 years to life in

prison.

On appeal, Grim claims that the trial court abused its discretion in denying his

request for a continuance of the trial, permitting four witnesses to testify concerning his

commission of four prior robberies, and refusing to dismiss any of his prior strikes at

sentencing. We affirm the judgment.

All subsequent statutory references are to the Penal Code, unless otherwise specified.

II.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A. The People's evidence

1. The events of September 11, 2009

On the morning of September 11, 2009,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.