United States v. Benito Ledesma-Sanchez

Good Law
608 F. App'x 501
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 25, 201514-10263California120 words

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Benito Ledesma-Sanchez appeals from the 64-month sentence imposed upon remand for resentencing following his guilty-plea conviction for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

Ledesma-Sanchez contends that the district court violated Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(i)(3)(B) by failing to make an express ruling about whether he had a prior conviction for robbery that would support a 16-level enhancement. The district court expressly determined that the 16-level enhancement validly applied. Accordingly, the court satisfied the requirements of Rule 32. See Fed. R.Crim.P. 32(i)(3)(B).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.