Verdugo

Verdugo v. Alliantgroup

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 25, 2015G049139MCalifornia8,624 words

Opinion

Opinion

Aronson, J.

Filed 6/25/15 (unmodified opn. attached)

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

RACHEL VERDUGO,

Plaintiff and Appellant, G049139

v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2013-00643612)

ALLIANTGROUP, L.P., ORDER (1) MODIFYING OPINION

AND (2) DENYING REHEARING;

Defendant and Respondent. NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT

On the court’s own motion, it is ordered the opinion filed in the above- entitled matter on May 28, 2015, is hereby MODIFIED as follows: 1. On page 3, the first sentence of the first full paragraph, starting with “The few cases Alliantgroup cites,” insert the words “Labor Code” between the words “in the context of a” and “wage and hour dispute,” so the sentence reads as follows: The few cases Alliantgroup cites do not address how a Texas court will view a choice-of-law clause in the context of a Labor Code wage and hour dispute between a Texas employer and a California employee, and Alliantgroup fails to address the competing policies of these two states. 2. On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.