Cosentino

Cosentino v. Fuller

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 25, 2015G050923NCalifornia9,486 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 6/25/15 (second of two modifications; first modification and unmodified opn. follow)

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

BENEDICT COSENTINO,

Plaintiff and Appellant, G050923

v. (Super. Ct. No. MCC1300396)

STELLA FULLER et al., ORDER FURTHER MODIFYING

OPINION; NO CHANGE IN

Defendants and Respondents. JUDGMENT

On the court’s own motion, it is ordered the opinion filed in the above- entitled matter on May 28, 2015, as modified by the order filed on June 22, 2015, is hereby FURTHER MODIFIED as follows:

1. On page 7 of the opinion, the earlier modification order deleted all of the original text of footnote number 1 and replaced it with new text, that new text is now modified to read as follows rather than as it read in the earlier modification order: Cosentino contends he did not name the Gaming Commission or the Pechanga Band as defendants in this action because he anticipated they would assert tribal sovereign immunity.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.